| It seems that I cannot come up a paper for this time |
[Sep. 12th, 2006|11:36 pm] |
My advisor sent us an email about a conference which will be at Atlanta in this November, This is a conference co-initiated by IEEE and CreateNet. And it is calling for papers about collaborative learning, etc. I think that will be very good chance. But I don't have enough time to come up a paer now. Feel regret. Hope I could catch the chance for next time. http://www.collaboratecom.org/index.php |
|
|
| I am really bad at interviewing |
[Sep. 2nd, 2006|02:35 am] |
I listened the interviews I did in the past summer. They are horrible. I find that I just keep induct the interviewees to points that I think what might be "correct". And I missed a lot of chance to get the conversation deeper to get more informaiton, or, data. I need to listen them more. |
|
|
| How do I do literature review? |
[Sep. 1st, 2006|12:28 am] |
|
Question 1: Even the Fink's book said that we should look at some experimental or qusi-experimental research, the first hand experience, it is still confusing to me: What part do I should review when I am looking at a research? Usually a paper including parts of introduction, literature review, the design, findings, and conclusion. Should I only look at parts of design, findings and conclusion? |
|
|
| Hints from Dr.Reeves |
[Aug. 23rd, 2006|06:00 pm] |
I talked about my findings from the pilot study during the summer. His view about my study gave me a lot of inspiration:
- Students may not be motivated to do the e-p. They cannot see what they are doing and why they want to do this. It is very important for researchers and instructors to find out a linkage between teachers' motivation--want to innovate or doing something special or get a better instructional method or get a better assessment method and students' motivation--to get credits and graduate.
- It is much more difficulty to motivate undergraduate students than k-12 or faculties to use e-portfolios . Because k-12 students may be more novelty and willing to learn something that could be shown when they apply a college, and faculties may want to use e-portfolios as a showcase to record what they've done for their work and their research. But for undergraduates, they usually just want to get credits and graduate.
- Different courses have different requirement. Portfolios come from the arts and architecture major students. It may be much easier and more necessary for them to use an e-p to record and monitor what they are doing. We may want to develop a model and make some criteria to decide those courses that need e-p.
- Comparison between an e-p about an authentic project and an e-p with non-authentic project.
- I need literature review!
|
|
|
| Analysis for the Maymester Interviews |
[Jun. 7th, 2006|11:46 am] |
|
I have asked those questions: 1. Have you ever heard about e-portfolios before you start this class? Only one guy heard about e-portfolio before this class among the 7 interviewees. 2. What is your expectation when you started your development of this e-portfolio? Most of the interviewee said they will get more computer skills from the projects of productivity tools. Only 3 or 4 said that they will use it in their future career.(All the 3 people are in education major. ) Those who are not preparing to go to the teacher career usually said they may not use e-portfolio in their career. Although one non-education major guy said that he may want to use google pages as his online advertisement for his restaurant in the future. 3. Could you give me your own definition of the e-portfolio? Most of them said that is a place to put what your have done (your works) on the website. Some of them said that the e-portfolio could be a showcase for other people showing what they've done and what they can do. 4. If you feel comfortable, could you tell me when did you first touch with computer and internet? For the undergraduate whose ages are around 19-20, they usually touch computers and internet in their middle school or high school. Some of elder students touched computers when they went to the college. 5. Could you give me your self-evaluation about your own computer skills? Most of them feel that they could do the basic computer works such as typing and email. One elder participant said that she started learning how to type and use email when she went into the college. 6. Did you get some help from other people during your e-portfolio development? Who? What kind of? Some of them said that they got help from the instructors. Some of them said that they got feedback from their friends and the people sit beside them. Those are about 3 or 4 people. The left people tended to say that they developed the e-portfolio independently and they got no help or feedback from others. 7. Did you refer to outside resources during your e-portfolio development? What kind of? About 5 or 4 said that they used google or other internet resources to get what they wanted; One said that she used the school library to get the textbooks what she propsed to focus on. (Actually there were about 5 people in the 13-person class who checked out textbooks to get some references.) One said that he used Excel, Microsoft office, google, etc. Most of them said that they used a lot of the resources such as the Mircorsoft lesson plans, the Apple Imovie lesson plans, etc. Everyone went back to look through what the previous students did. 8. Do you have planned to use e-portfolio in your future career? How? One girl said she really planed to use e-portfolio in her future teaching to show students what they gonna do and some examples. And she also wanted to use Blog to announce what the lesson content will be. One guy said that he will use e-portfolio as the showcase of his menu for his future restaurant. Another girl and one woman said that they gonna use e-portfolio to share what they've done with the class with other teachers. 9. Did you go back to look through the original classes' students' e-portfolios? What kind of criteria? Everyone went back to look through what the previous students did. Some of them said they didn't have any criteria. But actually, almost everyone were trying to select those being close with their major and their proposed grades. One guy said he usually skipped those that were too "girlly". 10. It is the first time we using google pages as our portfolio server. What do you feel? Could you make comparison between google pages and self-designed web-pages with Dreamweaver? Most of the students have not used Dreamweaver yet. But all of them said that they would like to use google pages because it is easy to use. 11. Will you go on using google pages if it starts charging in the future? All of them said yes except one guy. Most of them said maybe if it will charge for like a couple of dollars per month. But the last guy said he may go on to use it even when it charges 50 bucks per month. 12. Could you give me your own definition about reflection? Most of them said that is an overview of what you've done and summarize your works. 13. Is the reflection part difficult for you in the e-portfolio development? Half of them said it is not difficult. In the left half, some of them said that it was difficult when they began to review what they've done, but once they reviewed what they've done, the reflection then was just to write it. The others said that they felt hurt to write the reflection. One guy said that he cannot understand why they need to write the reflection because they already have done all the projects and learned how to use them. And to go back to review what they've done 15 days ago was a painful process because this Maymester was so concentrative and tough and they've done so many things so that he cannot retrieve what he did. Two or three said at the beginning, they were just feeling lost because they didn’t get the sense that they should follow the rubrics. It may be suggested that the point that the students are required to follow the rubrics closely to get all of the points are very important. 14. How do you usually write your reflection part? -----> Change to: What did you usually write in your reflection part? Two or three of them said that they were just answering those questions in the rubric. One said that he usually looked back what he did and then started to write. All of them said that the rubric is really helpful and fine and enough. 15. Do you think the reflection part is helpful for your class practice? What kind of if there is? Almost all of them said it is helpful, although only two or three of them said in details that what kind of helps it had. One or two interviewees said that the reflection helps you to remember what did you do and how did you do those projects. So that you want remind how to do those things. None of them mentioned that the reflection will be helpful for their class practice. Two guys mentioned that they also had the reflection part in their first year when they had the English writing class. But their attitudes or feelings toward it were totally different. One said that the reflection part was very useful because it made him to look backward his improvements from the every first paper to the last one. There were eight papers and he got improvements in each of them. But the other guy said that it was useless and he felt it was hurt to write that reflection and he don't think it will help his writing. And he already forgot what he did in the EMMA project. As to the EMMA, these two guys also had different comments on the whole EMMA project. The former guy said that it is very fancy and helpful and convenient. He said he like the way to submit the assignment online and you can also download the software and all the assignments and the reflections could be saved in his own computer so that he can go back to look through them. The other guy even said he hated this project. He said the EMMA's functions such as the online submitting for the assignment make him confused. And he doesn’t know what those for. 16. What part is the most difficult part in your reflection process? Most of them said that it was to look back what they have done. I think this question has not got very much useful information in its answers. 17. What part is the most challenging part in your e-portfolio development? Most of them said that was the powerpoint game part. One guy said that were the Webquest part and the Captitone projects. One guy said that he felt it was difficult to figure out how to upload files and how to make links. The other woman said that the Webquest part make her confused. The reason was that for the Webquest, the template was confusing and it was not easy to understand what they gonna do. She also said that she didn't know where there should be a WebQuest part because she thought the WebQuest part was very similar with the Powerpoint game part. For the captistone part, the guy said that he didn't understand why there were so many repeated items. That is not the part of the e-portfolio. That is just what the projcets are. I should modify the question and to figure out how to get the information I want. 18. What part is your favorite part in your e-portfolio? Most of them said it was the powerpoint game although that is not the component of the e-portfolio, just a project. 19. What part is the most important part do you think in your e-portfolio? They also said that was the powerpoint game. I may need to change my questions to get what I want. 20. How do you usually write your reflection part? Do you use the rubric? Repeated to the 14th question. 21. Do you think there is something needs to improve in the rubric? What kind of if there is? Most of them said nothing needs to be improved. Only 1 or two said just for themselves, at the right beginning, they didn't know how the rubric related to their projects and how they should use the rubrics to finish their assignments. 22. Do you still have other things that you think you may want to share with me? Usually not. One guy gave a lot of praise for the class. He said that the instructor was really very flexible and organized. She got a very good preparation for the class. And he also said that he liked the food part because he liked to have food to eat. But he also said that he felt the Loti part was too short and that made the reflection a little bit more difficult because the rubric asked them to go back to the LoTi standard but he actually didn't exactly know what it was. Totally Analysis:
- Some questions could not get the information that I wanted:
- What part do you think was the most important part in the e-portfolio?
- What part is your favorite part in your e-portfolio?
- What part do you think was the most challenging part in your e-portfolio?
- The reason was that the students thought that the e-portfolio means all the projects they've done. Were what I thought and what I intended to get from those questions wrong? This actually reflected that they have not understood what the class is really about. ????
- The other reason that I didn't get a lot of "useful" information that I wanted may be also because that most of the interviews were done before the final reflection part.
- Is reflection really important in this class? Is this mainly for "Learning By Design"?
- My identification of the teaching internship still have some influence on the students. When they talked to me, I can feel that.
|
|
|
| Many things to record |
[Jun. 5th, 2006|09:06 am] |
This morning from 8:00am to 8:25 am I just interviewed another student in the class. He is the 5th student I interviewed in this study. However, I will not use those data in my publication though. There are lots of things I thought during the interview process. And I also learned a lot. But the current problem is that, after the first three interview, I got some experience, but at the same time, I found I lost the passion to interview them: every time I asked the same questions, and there are not so many diverse answers towards to my questions. These are the frequently asked questions by me during the interview: 1. Have you ever heard about e-portfolios before you start this class? 2. What is your expectation when you started your development of this e-portfolio? 3. Could you give me your own definition of the e-portfolio? 4. If you feel comfortable, could you tell me when did you first touch with computer and internet? 5. Could you give me your self-evaluation about your own computer skills? 6. Did you get some help from other people during your e-portfolio development? Who? What kind of? 7. Did you refer to outside resources during your e-portfolio development? What kind of? 8. Do you have plan to use e-portfolio in your future career? How? 9. Did you go back to look through the original classes' students' e-portfolios? What kind of criteria? 10.It is the first time we using google pages as our portfolio server. What do you feel? Could you make comparison between google pages and self-designed web-pages with Dreamweaver? 11. Will you go on using google pages if it start charging in the future? 12.Could you give me your own definition about reflection? 13. Is the reflection part difficult for you in the e-portfolio development? 14. How do you usually write your reflection part? 15. Do you think the reflection part is helpful for your class practice? What kind of if there is? 16. What part is the most difficult part in your reflection process? 17. What part is the most challenging part in your e-portfolio development? 18. What part is your favorite part in your e-portfolio? 19. What part is the most important part do you think in your e-portfolio? 20. How do you usually write your reflection part? Do you use the rubric? 21. Do you think there is something need to improve in the rubric? What kind of if there is? 22. Do you still have other things that you think you may want to share with me?
At the beginning, every student's answer was very interesting and fresh for me. But after three interviews, I found there are not so much diverse among those answers. For most the questions they have the similar answers. But just now, when I sit here and think over the reason, I think I might get some cause for the interview answers' monotonousness: maybe just because I just interviewed 2 girls and 3 boys, while the three boys are very good friends and they have the similar habits, interests, and even the very similar backgrounds on the computer skills! Maybe there will be more divergences when I get more interviewees. |
|
|
| Transcription is so hard and boring! |
[Jun. 1st, 2006|12:36 am] |
Today I started my interviewing on my e-portfolio pilot study on the May semester of EDIT2000 class. I interviewed a girl on my class this morning. I was very nervous although she was really nice and friendly. I just sit down since 10 pm this evening to make transcription of this interview. My voice sound horrible in the audio record and my tone was kind of tied and it makes me feel really bad and awkward for my English speaking skill.
It is so hard to make transcriptions that I just finished a quarter for the whole interview. I know it was about 45 minutes and I just finished 14:49 of it... I feel so sleepy and there will be two more tomorrow. One will be on the morning, when the other one will be on the afternoon...
I wanna go to bed... How could other doctoral student make their lives??? |
|
|
| My co-teaching life |
[May. 25th, 2006|02:45 pm] |
I feel very lucky and grateful these days when I co-teach with Gretchen on the class of EDIT2000. The American undergraduate students are not unruly as I thought. All of them are kind and some of them are even very sociable and genial. They smiled at me when I spoke with my tongue-tied English. 
When they asked questions, I went there and taught them how to perform on the computer. Sometimes when I just didn't know how to say it in English, I said:"Could you let me show you?" And then they just let me use the mouse and keyboards , and with my fragment sentences to show how to perform the task. Fortunately, those questions were mainly about computer skills and I am quite familiar with most of those problems so that I won't feel awkward for I didn't know the answer. But from yesterday, I decided to try to talk as much as I can when I teach them. One reason is that I think to be a teacher, you must communicate with the students; the other reason is that, I feel that American students usually want to perform the task independently. They don't want to you teach them too much , and they don't want to you make them feel they are not capable and treat them as kids. To be a teacher, you must make them feel that they could do it by themselves and you'd better not interrupt or intervene their learning too much, although usually it will be much easier for the teacher to just show students all the steps to complete the objective. This is really tricky.
I am also lucky to have such a nice instructor with my internship. She allowed me to add ten extra credits on the portfolio part as an incentive for the students who will take part in my research. I think she is so nice to work with and so kind. She always make me feel that I am not obligated to do anything that I may feel awkward or hard and she gives me a lot of suggestions about the teaching stuff. She makes me feel much more comfortable with my English and all other things.
Another interesting is that, when you work with others, you will find different teacher has some specific emphases when they grade students' works. During the last two weeks, I learned how to grade this class' assignments and I found she is kind of critical on students' typos. That make me feel ashamed on myself , because apparently, I won't be a good student on her class-- I always always make so many typos in my writing works and rely so much on the word checking function... Anyway, I will go to the Park Hall sometime during this summer to seek help from the writing assistance group. Hope it will improve my writing in many aspects.
I just talked about my e-portfolio research for this May session at the beginning of today's class. I made 3 pages of ppt slides and explained briefly what this research is; what are the benefits; what they will do to attend this research and the available time slots. I was so worried that there won't be many people who want to help me when I speak this to them. I told them that they can come and sign on my time schedule if they want to help. And when the class was ending, I was worried once again because it seemed nobody still remembered what I talked at the class' beginning. And I even dared not to repeat it because I was afraid that no one will response to me and that will be awkward! However, an always-smiling girl turned to me and said she want to attend this research. I felt so grateful and happy when she wrote down the time slot she preferred. After this, another girl came and signed. At the last, three boys on this class went to me and signed on my schedule. I feel happy because I already got five people for this research and there will more on tomorrow morning's class and from the doctoral students' first year review! Although some people may say "I don't want to take part in this study" later but it seems still a good start, anyway!
Thanks for all these things going on. Thanks God. I feel I am so lucky and hope I won't make all people who love me and helped me disappointed. |
|
|
| The first year review is coming ! |
[Apr. 13th, 2006|09:23 am] |
We will have the first year review tomorrow. K, one of the collegues in the office , asked me whether I was ready for that. I said no. I still need prepare for it after the working schedule today. Also, we will have a meeting this afternoon for all Dr.Reeves' first year students. I think we are lucky. K said their department doesn't have this kind of system-to push the first year doctoral student to think over they've done in their first year of doctoral study. He think it is good to have this kind of system because then you could get advice from others. He said he felt maybe because their program is for adult education so they treat their doctoral students in an adult way: you could do whatever you want to do. But he think that is no good because sometimes even adults still need some stimulation and advice. |
|
|
| A inspiring sentence |
[Feb. 21st, 2006|10:45 pm] |
|
A small sample is selected precisely because the researcher wishes to understand the particular in depth, not to find out what is generally true of the many. |
|
|
| It is good feeling to feel I learned something! |
[Feb. 6th, 2006|09:46 pm] |
| [ | Current Mood |
| | bouncy | ] | I just finished reading the article of Conceptual Context: What Do You Think Is Going On? by Maxwell, J.A. It is very helpful when I found he said the research concept or theoretical framework could a combination of several different existing theories. I feel happy because I have been confused and perplexed because there have been sereval posibble theory existing in my mind which are my candidate framework for my coming research. DBR, self-assessment, learning by design , summative assessment and formative assessment...
I think I probably won't use all of these theories in my future research, but to know that I could combine multi theories to sustain my design research is really a good thing....
Also, I learned how to construct my concet map . I read the term of concept map last semester, but I don't know what it is. Now I not only learned what it is but also why it is important and helpful to conduct myself research.
I think I will conduct my own concept map after I finish the learning by design books.
From recent learning experience on these classes recently: DBR, 8400, EPSY6800 , and ERSH8310, I feel it is very helpful to rule out my feeling of being at a loss in IT field. I should have taken more classes last semester....... 
|
|
|
| What is developmental research? |
[Feb. 5th, 2006|06:14 pm] |
| [ | Current Mood |
| | frustrated | ] | To understand it, I should go to find Developmental Research Methods by Richey and Klein. But there are so many papers and books waiting for me to read.... |
|
|
| Some feeling after reading Diana Joseph 2004 article |
[Feb. 5th, 2006|02:30 pm] |
| [ | Current Mood |
| | confused | ] | This is a good article and I learned a lot from this article , including the author's research methods, analysis methods and how to focus research questions, especially the last one.
I think it is very helpful in helping me form myself research questions and philosophy...
But I am not happy when I read for "solve" the problem of time limitation for the passion curriculum , Joseph just simply changed his research context from the former small scaled urban summer program to another "more extended, more intensive context for the activities...(p. 238)".
Also, for solving the problem of flight was a bad choice for a passion curriculum , he just selected another more "attractive" theme---video making to instead....
Although he describe his shift as "The theme choice in interest-based design remains important for future research , but simply chooseing a better theme is an effective short-term solution that premits the project to move forward. (p. 238)" And he explained for his shift about the time issue:"This was another short-cutting venture--rather than pursue a complete investigation of why the several small-case GBSs had not worked, we simply moved away from that tactic.(p.238)" I still can't help to feel disappointed for his choice.
In my opinion, if our filed's researchers just likely prefer to research or study the easier context or theme or topic, like Joseph did, how could we really SOLVE problems in our really practice ? How could our educational research get respect from public and other fileds? When I read Joseph provide three possible explanations for the disappointing results of the flight curriculum, I felt curious and expected what kinds of solvement or methods he would adopt to solve these problems. I didn't anticipate he will just simply "solve" the first two problems by "change the theme" and "shift the program". Although he tried to solve the third problem: the problem of motivation and he did achieve good production. That is not a plead to flee from the "hard" problems which really need to solve at my view---at this case , the really "hard" and "realistic" problems are the first two: time limitation to foster students' interest , and theme selection.
As my opinion, design based researchers , even all researchers in educational fields, they should focus on problems which could serve for real educational practice. I am not saying that the motivation issues of the third problem are not our practical issues, but there are already many of articles, designs and models about motivation. However, the real classroom still have many practical questions and problems which are seldom touched by researchers, such as the problems of time limitation and theme selection. Because not all schools could have enough time for a sepcific "passion curriculum", on the contrary, it is impossible for most of schools provide enough time for each curriculum. It is the hard part of this research , which was "solved" by using another time arranged program instead. Meanwhile, does "passion curriculum " only focus to solve curriculums which are highly interested by students? If the answer is yes, I am suspicious how much meaning or significance this kind of research has. I think it is much more important or emergent to solve how to make students be more motivated on themes which are originally not attractive or interesting.
Although the author also said "The question of motivational affordances could not be addressed through a local solution-- we simply did not know how to address it. We needed a design theory to proceed , and we surmised that other designers and design-based rsearchers could benefit from such a theory as well.(p. 238)" I am not anticipating there are a lot of researchers who are going to solve these un-solved problems or answer these two questions. The article gave me this feeling: These hard or tough problems will be kept untouched forever because they are far more difficult to be solved as I think.
All these thinking above are just my feeling because I admit that I still have not read enough research cases and have no enough background to comment on a guru's work. But I think I should record what I am thinking in my learning and growing. That will be a good reflective thinking tool when I look back 2 or 3 years later.
|
|
|
| I like examples in articles |
[Feb. 4th, 2006|03:44 pm] |
| [ | Current Mood |
| | amused | ] | In fact, I also have many confusing and different opinion or suspicions with DBR. I am trying to understand DBR firstly from the "Postitive" perspectives. After that I will find out whether my suspicions are correct and potential. :-)
At the beginning of this class---DBR, I have been always confused by the deep conceptions, terminologies . Today is my most illuminated day because I read Collins, et.al., 2004, which has two design research cases .
I like examples because they could help me undertand the principles and theories. And the detailed descrition helps me rule out some suspicions about this field. Maybe it is because I had learned natural science and engineering for a long time, I like to see how a theory could be implemented in the practice. Only when I see the practice, I would believe the theories and princples behind it. |
|
|
| Notes for Collins, 1992,Toward a design science of Education |
[Feb. 2nd, 2006|09:52 pm] |
Reading this article makes me beginning of thinking and knowing what is a design theory. There is an interpretion for this conception at page 19: "...This design theory will attempt to sepcify all the vairables what values on these variables maximize chances for success, and how different variables interact in creating successful designs"
After reading this article, I searched the meaning of some points I don't understand. There are definitions and my understandings of these points:
- Satuation(p.20). At first I guess "saturation" is another terminology from quantitative or other field . Then I searched on google and compared the meaning of "moderate saturation" and "high saturation" according to the context . Then I decided here saturation is only the ratio of computer / student. When the computer / students is high, like every student can use one computer, that is a high saturation, and students could work for learge amounts of time on projects with the teacher acting as a coach, according to this article.Contrarily, when there are several students using one computer, that is a moderate saturation, and activity centers in the classroom may be the basic teaching type.
- What is "Subject-matter learning"? As my understanding, subject-matter learning is learning focus on a specific subject. The goal is to impove students' learning of this subject.
- "Susan Loucks"' seven levels of expertize teachers move through as they gain greater ease and sophistication.??????????
- What is "Activity-centered classroom"?
- Stevens describes it as an enviroment where:
- Students choose their own areas of study within the theme suggested by the teacher.
- Students do whatever is necessary to find the information required to pursue their projects.
- Students present their findings in some form that they
have selected, such as a model, a picture, a written handout, or
whatever means they consider appropriate.
- Students use each other as well as the teacher as resource persons.
- By Cindy LaVan
Activity-centered classrooms allow students to participate in hands-on activities. The goal is to improve aural comprehension and oral fluency, but students can also be involved in reading and writing activities. A theme is suggested by the teacher, and students chooose their own area of study. They investigate the topic, then present their findings in the form they choose.
- What is "Tom Snyder's Search Series"?
|
|
|
| It is really useful to read through the reference |
[Jan. 22nd, 2006|02:57 pm] |
I have not belived what my mentors and peers told me: Reading through
the articles' or books' reference until just now I read through a
reference and found something useful for my coming QUAL8400 assignment due:
We have an assignment due on Feb 1st, which is requiring us propose a article using qualitative research methodoloy and make comments.
And I just found there is a journal named :"Qualitative Studies in Education".
That will be helpful for me find one article realted with my research interest I think. |
|
|
| A difference between grounded theory research approach and experimental studies. |
[Jan. 22nd, 2006|11:04 am] |
| [ | Tags | | | design based research | ] |
| [ | Current Mood |
| | amused | ] |
| [ | Current Music |
| | http://www.suede.co.kr/files/suede-beautiful_ones.mpg | ] |
I had been always thinking there are
something similar or even same between the qualitative research
approach of grounded theory and DBR's experimental studies. Because
both of them are inductive, producing some theories to guide the locale
practice.
Also, both of them, the researchers must adjust their questions, methods, and strategies according to the data they collect in the researching process.
Today I just read Sharan B. Merriam
et.al's book of Qualitative Research in Practice, and found there are
some clearance for both of them:
"Unlike hypotheses in experimental
studies, grounded theory hypotheses are tentative and suggestive rather
than tested."
I hope I could read more about these two conceptions.
|
|
|
| Summary and thinking about Brown's article |
[Jan. 19th, 2006|11:38 pm] |
The author articulated his main purpose is that
"learning theory has undergone major
modifications even within the cognitivist period of the last
20 years, and methodological
changes are needed to reflect these developments." (p.
144)
Hence, Brown reviewed his learning theory's transferring
history:
|
Time
|
Learning theory
|
Methods
|
|
1970s
|
human memory(Information Processing dealing with capacity)
|
training study (p144, p145)
|
|
Late of 1970s
|
Cognitive strategies (dealing with mental events)(p145)
|
|
|
Late half of 1970s
|
Metacognition (“an important shift from passive to active
metaphors of learning”)(p146)
|
|
|
1980s—
|
Issues of content and contexts of learning(p 147)
|
“my own research also reflected a shift to the study of
learning, remembering, and understanding complex texts, which in turn led to
studies of reading comprehension and comprehension monitoring in specific
content areas”
|
Introduction of author’s Reading Comprehension experimental
research. (P 152)
Methodological issues in evaluating complex intervention
studies:
·
The relationship between laboratory and
classroom work;
·
Idiographic versus nomothetic approaches, or the
grain-size issue;
·
The Bartlett Effect, or the problem of data
selection.
I think it is a good illustration of qualitative research
and how to evolve an experimental research, although Brown asserted that “because
of the multifaceted nature of my data base, I prefer a mixed approach, suiting
the method to the particular data.”
Brown “combine a concentration on large scale data bases
with in-depth microgenetic analyses of a few children or perhaps a group.”
Lessons learned from the history of educational design
experiments:
·
The hawthorne
Effect
·
The Dewey Effect
o Readiness
to learn
o Discovery
learning
o The
curriculum and society
·
The reality principle
|
|
|
| What is EPSS? |
[Jan. 14th, 2006|11:32 pm] |
|
I searched Wiki but there seems be no definition for this abbreviative word.
And it is explained like this on website of http://www.epssinfosite.com/:
EPSS
is defined as an integrated electronic environment that is available to
and easily accessible by each employee and is structured to provide
immediate, individualized on-line access to the full range of
information, software, guidance, advice and assistance, data, images,
tools, and assessment and monitoring systems to permit job performance
with minimal support and intervention by others.
In the ground-breaking book Electronic Performance Support Systems published in 1991, Gloria Gery, defined EPSS as:
“an integrated electronic environment that is available to and easily
accessible by each employee and is structured to provide immediate,
individualized on-line access to the full range of information,
software, guidance, advice and assistance, data, images, tools, and
assessment and monitoring systems to permit job performance with
minimal support and intervention by others.”
I think this link will be a helpful one from San Diego State University to understand what is EPSS:
http://coe.sdsu.edu/eet/articles/epss/index.htm
 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 License. |
|
|
| I tried another blog service provider —blogger |
[Jan. 14th, 2006|11:31 pm] |
I have known blogger.com for a long time but never tried it until just now.
It is belong to Google also.
I like Google, but after I tried blogger, I don’t like it so much.
The main reseason is it is not so convinient as edublogs when you try to edit links.
Of course it gives you much more freedom to edit your blog’s
apperance with html language as you like. But what I need is just a
simple blog , to accomplish my requirements of publish my idea , add
links and view others’ comments.
Also, edublogs have some shortcomings.
It doesn’t allow you to edit the blog’s template.
You can just choose one from its templates. And I don’t like the “About this site”.
It also saids:”Just another Edublogs.org weblog” and I still have not found where I can change or get rid of it.
Although I have another “About” on the right side under the “Pages“.
Also, it doesn’t allow you change your font directly by simply press a
font button. If you want to change a word or a phrase’s font, you can
just edit it under “HTML” mode.
People always don’t like to accept unfamiliar things except they find there are much more interesting features. Me too.
 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 License. |
|
|
| navigation |
| [ |
viewing |
| |
most recent entries |
] |
| [ |
go |
| |
earlier |
] |
| |
|
|